Page 55 - COS-FOD2015

Ab Ghani et al.

References

1. Alvarez JA, Rezende KMPC, Marocho SMS, 6. Kamble VD and Parkhedkar RD. Esthetic
Alves FBT, Celiberti P, Ciamponi AL. Dental rehabilitation of discolored anterior teeth with
fluorosis: exposure, prevention and manage- porcelain veneers. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;
ment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009: 4: 124-6.
14; 103-107.
7. Debnanth S, Wunder SL, McCool JL, Baran
2. McDonagh M, Whiting P, Bradley M, Cooper GR. Silane treatment effects on glass/resin
J, Sutton A, Chestnut I. A systematic review interfacial shear strengths. Dent Mater 2003;
of public water fluoridation. Br Med J 2000; 19: 441-8.
321:855-859.
8. Chiayi S, Oh WS, William JR. Effect of post-
3. Sharol LS, Rahimah AK, Tuti NMD. Esthetic silanization drying on the bond strength of
perception and psychosocial impact of de- composite to ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2004;
velopmental enamel defects among Malaysi- 91: 453-8.
an adolescents. Journal of Oral Science
9. Filho AM, Vicira LC, Araujo E, Monteiro JS.
2004; 4: 221-6.
Effect of different ceramic surface treat-
4. Griffin SO, Beltra ́n ED, Lockwood SA and ments on resin microtensile bond strength. J
Barker LK. Esthetically objectionable fluoro- Prosthodontic 2004; 1: 28-35.
sis attributable to water fluoridation. Commu-
40.Huang BR, Wang XY and Gao XJ. Effects
nity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology.
of different surface treatments on ceramic
2002; 30: 199-209.
repairs with composite. Chin J Dent Res.
5. Celik EU, Yildiz G and Yazkan B. Clinical 2013; 16(2): 111-117.
evaluation of enamel microabrasion for the
aesthetic management of mild-to-severe
dental fluorosis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;
25: 422-430.

51