Page 34 - COS-FOD2015

Compend. Oral Sci:vol1(4);2015;21-31

3. Anusavice KJ (2003) In: Anusavice KJ ed. 11. Chong YH, Soh G, Setchell DJ, Wickens JL
Phillips’Science of Dental Materials pp. (1990) Relationship between contact angle
205-42, 11th ed. Saunders: London. of die stone on elastomeric impression ma-
terials and voids in stone casts. Dent Mater
4. Craig RG, O’Brien WJ, Powers JM (1996) In:
J 6, 162-66.
Craig RG, ed. Properties and Manipulation
pp. 136-77, Dental Materials 6th ed. Oxford. 12. Lee DY, OH YI, Chung KH, Kim KM, Kim
KN (2004) Mechanism study on surface acti-
5. Oh YI, Doug YL, Hwang SY, Nam Kim,K.,
vation of surfactant-modified polyvinylsilox-
Mahn Kim K (2003) Effect of non-ionic surfac-
ane impression materials. J Appl. Polym. Sci
tants on surface properties of hydrophilic poly-
92, 2396-2401.
vinyl siloxane impression materials. Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. As- 13. American Dental Association Council on
pects 229, 9-17. Dental Materials and Devices, Specification
No. 19 for non-aqueous, elastomeric dental
6. Lu H, Nguyen B, Powers JM (2004) Mechani-
impression materials (1977) JADA 94, 733-
cal properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone
41.
and polyether elastomeric impression materi-
als. J Prosthet Dent 92, 151-54. 14. Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Komatsu M. Sur-
face detail reproduction with new elastomer-
7. Petrie CS, Walker MP, William K (2005) A
ic dental impression materials (2007) Quin-
survey of US prosthodontists and dental
tessence Int 38, 479-88.
school on the current materials and methods
for final impressions for complete denture 15. International Standard: ISO 4823 (2000)
prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 14, 253-62. Dentistry - Elastomeric Impression Materials.

8. Petrie CS, Walker MP, O’Mahony M, Spencer 16. Walker MP, Petrie C, Haj-Ali R, Spencer P,
AP (2003) Dimensional accuracy and surface Dumas C, William K (2005) Moisture effect
detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl pol- on polymer and polyvinylsiloxane dimension-
ysiloxane impression materials tested under al accuracy and detail reproduction. J Pros-
dry, moist, and wet conditions. J Prosthet Dent thodont 14,158-63.
90, 365-72.
17. Ragain JC, Grosko ML, Raj M, Ryan TN,
9. Boening KW, Walker MH, Schuette U. Clinical Johnston WM (2000) Detail reproduction,
significance of surface activation of silicone contact angles, and die hardness of elasto-
impression materials. J Dent 1998 ; 26:447- meric impression and gypsum die material
52. combinations. Int J Prosthodont 13, 214-20.

10.Mc Cabe JF, Carrick TE (2006) Recording 18. Johnson GH, Lepe X, Aw TC (2003) The
surface detail on moist surfaces with elasto- effect of surface moisture on detail reproduc-
meric impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont tion of elastomeric impressions. J Prosthet
Restor Dent 14, 42-6. Dent 90, 354-364.

30