Page 29 - COS-FOD2015
P. 29

NZarina et al.



                Impression  making  and  evaluation  of  sur-  impressions were recorded using a high resolu-
                face detail reproduction                       tion  3D  optical  scanner  (InfiniteFocus,  Alicona
                                                               Imaging  GmbH,  Austria).  A  master  die  was
                Each master die was left at room temperature
                                                               placed  on  motorized  stage  with  magnification
                (23±1)°C  for  7  days  before  immersing  in  dis-
                                                               and vertical resolution selected at 5x and 60μm
                tilled  water  at  (37±1)°C  for  5  minutes  to  pro-
                                                               respectively. The coaxial white light was deliv-
                duce a moist die stone for the impression mak-
                                                               ered through a ring light. The start and end po-
                making. A pilot study revealed that the optimum   sitions  on  the  master  die  was  determined  by
                duration for Velmix die stone of 40 mm in diam-  moving  the  cursor  at  a  horizontal  plane  be-
                eter and 21 mm thick to be fully saturated with   tween  the  two  reference  points.  A  preliminary
                water  is  5  minutes.  Impression  making  proce-  scan (Figure 2) which was carried out to deter-
                dures for all tested materials were as described   mine the highest and lowest points at each ref-
                in the master die preparation stage. All medium  erence point; L1, L2 and L3. The entire 3D im-
                -  and  light-bodied  impression  materials  were   age  which  constitute  the  depths  of  grooves
                syringed  using  auto-mixing  impression  dis-  were  then  stitched  and  measurements  were
                penser  except  for  Impregum  Penta  and  Im-  then obtained using the software, Alicona Ver-
                pregum Penta H Duosoft which was dispensed     sion 2.1.5 Generation 4, 2008. The same pro-
                using a mechanical dispenser (Pentamix 2, 3M   cedure  was  repeated  for  the  impression.  Both
                ESPE, St Paul,USA).                            master  die  and  impression  were  illustrated  in
                                                               3D true colour and pseudocolour (Figure 3).
                The  topography  of  all  the  master  dies  and  its











































                      Figure 3: Illustration of 3D image of master die with true colour and pseudocolour images
                                 (a,b) and 2D measurement of master die’s grooves (V 1,V 2,U 1 and U 2)

                           Illustration of 3D image Express™ XT Light Body and Putty Soft with true colour and

                        pseudocolour images (c,d) and 2D measurement of Express™ XT Light Body and Putty Soft
                                                  Grooves (V 1,V 2,U 1 and U 2)

                                                            25
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34