Page 9 - COS-FOD2015
P. 9
Yusof et al.
Reference
1. Rothwell BR. Bite marks in forensic dentis- 7. Hyzer WG, Krauss TC. The Bite Mark
try: a review of legal, scientific issues. J Am Standard Reference Scale--ABFO No. 2.
Dent Assoc. 1995 Feb;126(2):223-32. J Forensic Sci. 1988 Mar;33(2):498-
506.
2. Zarkowski P. Bite mark evidence: its worth
in the eyes of the expert. J Law Ethics Dent. 8. Bowers CM, Johansen RJ. Photographic
1988;1(1):47-57. evidence protocol: the use of digital im-
aging methods to rectify angular distor-
3. Sweet D, Bowers CM. Accuracy of bite
tion and create life size reproductions of
mark overlays: a comparison of five com-
bite mark evidence. J Forensic Sci. 2002
mon methods to produce exemplars from a
Jan;47(1):178-85.
suspect's dentition. J Forensic Sci. 1998
Mar;43(2):362-7. 9. Wagner GN. Bitemark identification in
child abuse cases. Pediatr Dent. 1986
4. Martin-de las Heras S, Valenzuela A, Oga-
May;8(1 Spec No):96-100.
yar C, Valverde AJ, Torres JC. Computer-
based production of comparison overlays 10. Bernitz H, Piper SE, Solheim T, Van
from 3D-scanned dental casts for bite mark Niekerk PJ, Swart TJ. Comparison of
analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2005 Jan;50 bitemarks left in foodstuffs with models of
(1):127-33. the suspects' dentitions as a means of
identifying a perpetrator. J Forensic
5. Sweet D, Parhar M, Wood RE. Computer-
Odontostomatol. 2000 Dec;18(2):27-31.
based production of bite mark comparison
overlays. J Forensic Sci. 1998 Sep;43 11. Aboshi H, Taylor JA, Takei T, Brown KA.
(5):1050 Comparison of bitemarks in foodstuffs by
computer imaging: a case report. J Fo-
6. Odontology ASoF. Manual of Forensic
rensic Odontostomatol. 1994 Dec;12
Odontology. In: Herschaft EE, Alder ME,
(2):41-4.
Ord DK, Rawson RD, Smith ES, editors.
Manual of Forensic Odontology. 4 ed. 12. Bernitz H, Kloppers BA. Comparison mi-
New York: American Society of Forensic croscope identification of a cheese
Odontology; 2006. p. 170. bitemark: a case report. J Forensic Odon-
5
